ASEAN Issues in the Challenge of Transnational Crimes of Narcotics Smuggling in the Southeast Asian Region

July 15, 2019, oleh: superadmin

Rendy Prayuda achieved his Doctorate Degree after successfully explaining the results of his dissertation entitled, at the Open Session of the Islamic Political Doctoral Rpogram Open Session held at the UMY Integrated Campus Postgraduate Seminar Room Monday, July 15, 2019
The Islamic Political Doctoral Student Program was tested by 7 Promoters and Co-Promoters, one of whom was the Director of Jusuf Kalla Government School (JKSG), Prof. Dr. Achmad Nurmandi, M. Sc
Randi explained that ASEAN has not been able to unite its vision and mission in full. The mode of narcotics smuggling in the Southeast Asian region, instead of the variance type of narcotics, the changing route of smuggling and the use of advanced technology make ASEAN countries unable to use the acceleration of the motives used as narcotics smuggling.
According to Randy, preventive and repressive efforts have been carried out internationally by making various agreements and meetings, including the Annual Ministerial Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC), the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting in discussing the problem of narcotics threats (ASOD) in realizing the ASEAN Drug-Free, ASEAN Chiefs of National Police (ASEANAPOL) and ASEAN Narcotics Cooperation Center (ASEAN-Narco).
But the policies that have been carried out are not yet running optimally. Anticipation made is still partial and domestic by each country. The non-institutionalization of values ​​and norms for joint threats related to narcotics has resulted in the handling of this focus still on which countries feel the most negative effects of narcotics threats. The contradictions that occur in the spirit of a shared vision and mission of ASEAN member countries to eradicate narcotics ideally are still experiencing various obstacles, especially in bargaining at the Southeast Asian regional level and bargaining at the domestic level of the country in the form of implementation and rule of law of each ASEAN member country.
This means that the implementation of cooperation in handling the transnational crime of narcotics smuggling in Southeast Asia has occurred a contradiction between ideality and the reality of international organizations. Ideally, all ASEAN member countries agree on common values ​​and norms in the ASEAN security regime, but in reality what happens is that different perceptions of the threat of narcotics by each ASEAN member country and differences in the national interests of each country are difficult to unite resulting in what has been agreed upon and implemented not yet implemented optimally. (The key)